As you know the moderating team reads literally hundreds and hundreds of posts every day. If you are a thinking person like I am, sometimes you begin to see what looks like a trend or form new ideas based on what you read in more than one place. Having said all of that a question has come to mind and of course an opinion (yeah I know, I have a lot of them).
So many of you talk about eating addictions. And in truth the more I read and the more of your posts I read I don't think there is any such thing. I am not saying that eating addictions do not exist or that they are not a huge part of the problem, I'm saying they are a symptom and not the cause. It's a little of the what came first, the chicken or the egg. I am saying that addictive eating is something that needs to be controlled not by will power but by the proper balance of nutrients for our personal metabolism. Our industrialized diet has caused a disordered biofeedback system as to what we really need to eat, which has resulted in disordered metabolism and the resulting food addictions. Depending on shear willpower to control eating which is a powerful, powerful biological urge is something you can't win at long term. Treating obesity with a "diet" is like treating a chronic infection with a round of antibiotics. It will help you out for awhile, but eventually you will require another and another round of those antibiotics. You have not treated the source of your problem, you have put a band-aid on it. That's why diets don't work and lifestyle changes do. It's the reason obesity has the dismal long term cure rate of probably 10% in the overall population. Obesity is not born out of uncontrolled eating and lack of willpower, it's a chronic disease that needs continuous intervention.
I'd like to know why you do or don't agree with my statements based on your own personal experiences. Let me know what you think!